<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you need a Quad-core CPU?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/</link>
	<description>Tech experts answer your questions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Good article.

Quad core is aimed more at the gamers and people that need a stronger machine. So I feel that more often then not it is worth the extra money.

I'm running a Q6600 and what a dream. Nice to know that this will be the CPU to go for when more applications come out the will use all four cores. Also something to note. This CPU is like heaven to overclock. And so are most of the quads I understand. Makes sense as each core can handle more strain cause it can offload extra processes to the next core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
<p>Quad core is aimed more at the gamers and people that need a stronger machine. So I feel that more often then not it is worth the extra money.</p>
<p>I'm running a Q6600 and what a dream. Nice to know that this will be the CPU to go for when more applications come out the will use all four cores. Also something to note. This CPU is like heaven to overclock. And so are most of the quads I understand. Makes sense as each core can handle more strain cause it can offload extra processes to the next core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Good article I was going to but a quad core but I decided to but the E6850 core 2 Duo 3.0 ghz. Hop I made the right choice. Besides I don't even need a Quad Core yet maybe in the future. I like your style of writing.Oh I wonder how much the 80 core is going to go for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article I was going to but a quad core but I decided to but the E6850 core 2 Duo 3.0 ghz. Hop I made the right choice. Besides I don't even need a Quad Core yet maybe in the future. I like your style of writing.Oh I wonder how much the 80 core is going to go for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Fantastic article. Best I have seen that describes. I like how you went into the history and marketing on the cpus to describe how it was and where its going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic article. Best I have seen that describes. I like how you went into the history and marketing on the cpus to describe how it was and where its going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>doubtless quad cores will be faster then duals, it's just logic, you don't need to be a geek to work that out. But I think it's a question of if you really need it, I mean if you're running XP and all you're doing is IE, MSN and the like you're not going to notice any difference between Duals and Quads, I reckon it's only gonna benefit you if you want to really stretch the limits of your system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doubtless quad cores will be faster then duals, it's just logic, you don't need to be a geek to work that out. But I think it's a question of if you really need it, I mean if you're running XP and all you're doing is IE, MSN and the like you're not going to notice any difference between Duals and Quads, I reckon it's only gonna benefit you if you want to really stretch the limits of your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aCi11i3s</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>aCi11i3s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I'm currently running a Kentsfield on my nForce 680i, and thx to the heavens for both.  running games like Crysis at max settings, and runs smooth as a top.  great if you require or want this type of performance for the latest games or apps.  The quad is aided by a  1000wPSU, 2gb @ 1066mhz, and (2)8800gtx's...these do help out a bit too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm currently running a Kentsfield on my nForce 680i, and thx to the heavens for both.  running games like Crysis at max settings, and runs smooth as a top.  great if you require or want this type of performance for the latest games or apps.  The quad is aided by a  1000wPSU, 2gb @ 1066mhz, and (2)8800gtx's...these do help out a bit too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhilson</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>jhilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Very good article. Just like in auto mechanics, not just because you have a big engine your car will be faster in every dimension. You'll need a well designed transmission, a proper intake and exaust system and enough fuel injector capacity among others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article. Just like in auto mechanics, not just because you have a big engine your car will be faster in every dimension. You'll need a well designed transmission, a proper intake and exaust system and enough fuel injector capacity among others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Dual core is good enough for todays application for windows xp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dual core is good enough for todays application for windows xp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Railgun_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Railgun_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I just upgraded to a Q6600 and its like I strapped a supercharged V8 to my motherboard.

dont be fooled by the skepticism, quads are worth every penny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded to a Q6600 and its like I strapped a supercharged V8 to my motherboard.</p>
<p>dont be fooled by the skepticism, quads are worth every penny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baramee</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>baramee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>great article, I love your style. All the best green IT commentary comes out of England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article, I love your style. All the best green IT commentary comes out of England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstogo.com/2007/07/24/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstogo.com/180/do-you-need-a-quad-core-cpu/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I'm curious, has anyone recently 'upgraded' from a Core2 Duo, to a Core2 Quad? Notice any performance improvements, or system stability issues. Was the Quad core upgrade a noticeable improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious, has anyone recently 'upgraded' from a Core2 Duo, to a Core2 Quad? Notice any performance improvements, or system stability issues. Was the Quad core upgrade a noticeable improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
