Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Discover the best free computer help!
Learn more about Geeks to Go by taking the tour. Spyware, virus, trojan, fake security or privacy alerts? Read the malware cleaning guide.
      
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
One in Six PCs Could Be Infected With Malware, As many as one in six PCs may have active spyware...
Major Payne
post Nov 3 2007, 03:28 PM
Post #1


Trusted Techie
Group Icon
Posts: 4,178
From: In a FEMA "Tin Can"!
OS: Win XP. Backup PC: Commodore 64 with 300 baud modem!



As many as one in six PCs may have active spyware or malware infections.

QUOTE
A recent study performed by U.K. security vendor Prevx of 300,000 PCs showed that 15.6 percent of those machines had at least one active spyware or malware program installed. These programs, which include keyboard loggers that record keystrokes, information stealers and fake antispyware, are emerging at rates of 5,000 to 10,000 per day, company officials say.

Of these 300,000 PCs, the ones with no security software installed at all had infections rate 60 percent higher than those running some sort of antivirus, antimalware, or other security program.


More...


Ron
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tal
post Nov 3 2007, 03:47 PM
Post #2


Trusted Helper
Group Icon
Posts: 2,049
From: Tel-Aviv, Israel
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2



One in six?! That's more like, 5 in 6!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Major Payne
post Nov 3 2007, 05:02 PM
Post #3


Trusted Techie
Group Icon
Posts: 4,178
From: In a FEMA "Tin Can"!
OS: Win XP. Backup PC: Commodore 64 with 300 baud modem!



1 in 6 is still a lot and stats come from people who make it their business to research this information.

Ron
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ScHwErV
post Nov 3 2007, 06:42 PM
Post #4


Geek U Admin
Group Icon
Posts: 17,711
From: Michigan, USA
OS: All Windows Os's



Its not a statistic, its a guess. I wouldnt even call it an educated guess, its just a guess. Probably based on a poll of some sorts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BHowett
post Nov 3 2007, 06:54 PM
Post #5


Trusted Helper
Group Icon
Posts: 1,147
From: USA
OS: Windows XP professional



we need more fighters............on average it take 4-6 months for 1 fighter to get trained, so how many more PC's will be infected and how many new types of malware will there be? wacko.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Major Payne
post Nov 3 2007, 08:06 PM
Post #6


Trusted Techie
Group Icon
Posts: 4,178
From: In a FEMA "Tin Can"!
OS: Win XP. Backup PC: Commodore 64 with 300 baud modem!



QUOTE(ScHwErV @ Nov 3 2007, 07:42 PM) *
Its not a statistic, its a guess. I wouldnt even call it an educated guess, its just a guess. Probably based on a poll of some sorts.
Sorry, but it is a statistic. A study nevertheless from which a statistic was made is still a statistic.

Ron
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
don77
post Nov 3 2007, 08:17 PM
Post #7


Malware Expert
Group Icon
Posts: 18,632
From: Boston Ma.
OS: XP Pro,ME, 98



QUOTE
One in Six PCs Could Be Infected With Malware


QUOTE
A recent study performed by U.K. security vendor Prevx


Now depending on their definition of malware or spyware I suppose that comment could be true
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Major Payne
post Nov 3 2007, 09:04 PM
Post #8


Trusted Techie
Group Icon
Posts: 4,178
From: In a FEMA "Tin Can"!
OS: Win XP. Backup PC: Commodore 64 with 300 baud modem!



I'm sure their definition of malware includes a blanket definition. Could be they are reporting this as a slant to increasing business:

QUOTE
The company claims that major security vendors aren't keeping up with malware writers. Over the past three months, the ability of security software from Microsoft, Symantec, and Trend Micro to detect newly released spyware and malware hovered between 10 and 50 percent, they say.
tongue.gif

Ron
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
troy
post Nov 3 2007, 09:10 PM
Post #9


Tech Apprentice
Group Icon
Posts: 3,489
From: Gold Coast, Australia
OS: Microsoft Windows Vista Home (Basic and Premium) SP1 (32-bit), Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (32-bit)



I would venture a guess and agree with Fredil - there's probably more infected systems than that... It is very interesting, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
don77
post Nov 3 2007, 09:40 PM
Post #10


Malware Expert
Group Icon
Posts: 18,632
From: Boston Ma.
OS: XP Pro,ME, 98



QUOTE(troy @ Nov 3 2007, 11:10 PM) *
I would venture a guess and agree with Fredil - there's probably more infected systems than that... It is very interesting, though.



Ok but where is Fredil ?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PsychPosse
post Nov 3 2007, 09:41 PM
Post #11


Geek in Training
***
Posts: 322
From: Minnesota
OS: 98, XP, Vista Ultimate, openSUSE, Ubuntu



QUOTE(BHowett @ Nov 3 2007, 07:54 PM) *
we need more fighters............on average it take 4-6 months for 1 fighter to get trained, so how many more PC's will be infected and how many new types of malware will there be? wacko.gif


Seems to me that a better online browsing education is what is needed.
I have been going online for many years, I have not once gotten a virus of any sort, nor have I had any malware issues. I don't even run a firewall.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Major Payne
post Nov 3 2007, 10:14 PM
Post #12


Trusted Techie
Group Icon
Posts: 4,178
From: In a FEMA "Tin Can"!
OS: Win XP. Backup PC: Commodore 64 with 300 baud modem!



QUOTE(PsychPosse @ Nov 3 2007, 10:41 PM) *
Seems to me that a better online browsing education is what is needed. I have been going online for many years, I have not once gotten a virus of any sort, nor have I had any malware issues. I don't even run a firewall.
Smart malware will not give you any notice that you have it. The malware ones that cause PC problems and are written to make you have problems. There's smart malware that hides itself during scans and is very hard to detect and get rid of.

Running without a firewall is not something I would want to do even though I have been on the Internet for years, too. I like to block all my ports from the pingers and have absolute control over what runs or doesn't run.

Ron
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tal
post Nov 4 2007, 02:43 AM
Post #13


Trusted Helper
Group Icon
Posts: 2,049
From: Tel-Aviv, Israel
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2



QUOTE(don77 @ Nov 4 2007, 06:40 AM) *
QUOTE(troy @ Nov 3 2007, 11:10 PM) *
I would venture a guess and agree with Fredil - there's probably more infected systems than that... It is very interesting, though.



Ok but where is Fredil ?


laughing.gif I think he means me rolleyes1.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuxmaster
post Nov 4 2007, 04:05 AM
Post #14


BSOD Warrior/Computer Surgeon
Group Icon
Posts: 2,074
From: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
OS: WINDOWS XP, Linux



If it were just a virus issues. My anti virus programs on my systems have only detected 3 viruses sense 1995. However my Antispyware programs have detected a lot more not including cookies if you include cookies I would say 5.99 of 6 computers are infected. I had to live room for those computers that do not connect to the internet.

** starts another spyware scan of his system**

I would agree with PsychPosse though that better system security education is what we need. However I don't think that stops all of it.

This post has been edited by tuxmaster: Nov 4 2007, 04:08 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fredil
post Nov 4 2007, 09:30 AM
Post #15


Trusted Helper
Group Icon
Posts: 1,949
From: Wait, wait, I know this!
OS: Windows XP Professional SP2



That's why there's GeekU! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Time is now: 19th July 2008 - 08:43 PM
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. The forum is run by volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We make every attempt to ensure that the help and advice posted is accurate and will not cause harm to your computer. However, we do not guarantee that they are accurate and they are to be used at your own risk.