Welcome Guest ( Log In | Join )

Discover the best free computer help!
Learn more about Geeks to Go by taking the tour. Want to ask a question, reply to a topic, or remove all advertising? It's easy, fast and free. Join today!
Spyware, virus, trojan, fake security or privacy alerts? Please start with our malware cleaning guide.
     
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
System upgrade results in performance down-grade?
aminal
post Sep 4 2008, 10:24 AM
Post #1


New Member
*
Posts: 4
OS: xp



Hi guys, bit confused after my recent graphics card upgrade in preparation for Warhammer Online next week. I've put in a better graphics card and more powerful PSU, i did a system benchmark using NovaBench2 before and after and while my graphics performance has increased slightly, my CPU performance has decreased. results from the benchmarks are below:

i went from having Nvidia FX5200 to a Sapphire HD3850. I also upgraded my PSU from the original 300w to a OCZ StealthXStream 600w to power the new card.

With the old FX 5200
NovaBench Score: 146

04/09/2008 14:25:27
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.06GHz @ 3087 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
1024 MB System RAM (Score: 40)

CPU Tests (Score: 71)

- Floating Point Operations/Second: 39117144
- Integer Operations/Second: 12428791
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 2760

Graphics Tests (Score: 21)

- Random Lines Drawn/Second: 9628
- Random Shapes Drawn/Second: 3524

Hardware Tests (Score: 14)

- Primary Partition Capacity: 114 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 7.28 MB/s
____________________________________________________________________

With the new Sapphire HD3850
NovaBench Score: 131

04/09/2008 15:16:55
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.06GHz @ 3087 MHz
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 3850
1024 MB System RAM (Score: 40)

CPU Tests (Score: 50)

- Floating Point Operations/Second: 29796081
- Integer Operations/Second: 6886346
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 22708

Graphics Tests (Score: 25)

- Random Lines Drawn/Second: 12404
- Random Shapes Drawn/Second: 3249

Hardware Tests (Score: 16)

- Primary Partition Capacity: 114 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 8.62 MB/s [size="3"][/size]

This isn't a major problem but if im losing out on performance that i dont need to be i'd like to know.

Many thanks,
Chris

This post has been edited by aminal: Sep 4 2008, 10:26 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Titan8990
post Sep 4 2008, 12:23 PM
Post #2


Member
*****
Posts: 2,178
From: Louisville, Ky
OS: Windows XP Home, Ubuntu 8.04, Back Track 3, Slackware, Windows Server 2003



Synthetic benchmarks are not to be trusted. How has it been handling in real gaming?


Are you going Order or Destruction?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aminal
post Sep 4 2008, 12:42 PM
Post #3


New Member
*
Posts: 4
OS: xp



Well i put all the video settings on WoW upto full and the video is running very smooth, previously they were on about 30% and it was juddery so thats good news... Do you not think its something to be concerned with? My processors' Floating Point Operations/Second, Integer Operations/Second and MD5 Hashes Generated/Second have decreased. what does this even mean?

What benchmark Should I have used?



after playing a Pally for the last 2 years im feeling the need for something a deciededly evil so Marauder it is! Possibly a squig herder alt thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Titan8990
post Sep 4 2008, 12:51 PM
Post #4


Member
*****
Posts: 2,178
From: Louisville, Ky
OS: Windows XP Home, Ubuntu 8.04, Back Track 3, Slackware, Windows Server 2003



Marauder would have been my choice if my guild would have chose Destruction. I will be playing either a Bright Wizzard or a Shaddow Warrior.

QUOTE
What benchmark Should I have used?


Don't use benchmarks. Actual gaming performance is all that really matters.


QUOTE
Do you not think its something to be concerned with? My processors' Floating Point Operations/Second, Integer Operations/Second and MD5 Hashes Generated/Second have decreased. what does this even mean?


It's more or less how much it processes in a given time. Why it would lower beats me.

Have you downloaded and installed the latest drivers from the ATI/AMD website?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aminal
post Sep 4 2008, 02:57 PM
Post #5


New Member
*
Posts: 4
OS: xp



I had a look at the drivers on the website but it said only to download em if you have trouble, i might give it a go tomorrow... Cheers for advice titan wink.gif if anyone else gets any ideas why this might have changed pls let me know!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies / Views Topic Information
No New Posts   12 / 304 12th April 2006 - 09:43 PM
Fencingking007 started - last by Fencingking007
No New Posts   5 / 222 4th September 2008 - 11:22 AM
llama311 started - last by starjax
No New Posts   9 / 301 17th November 2008 - 03:56 PM
throwing.shapes started - last by Gravity Gripp
No New Posts   1 / 77 12th November 2008 - 05:19 PM
tomsgtg started - last by 123Runner

RSS Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 11:21 AM
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. The forum is run by volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We make every attempt to ensure that the help and advice posted is accurate and will not cause harm to your computer. However, we do not guarantee that they are accurate and they are to be used at your own risk.