Will this lay out work? |
![]() ![]() |
Will this lay out work? |
Sep 11 2007, 09:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Geek in Training ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 201 From: Kansas City OS: Vista Ultimate, XP Pro, Win 2000 Pro, Ubuntu 6.10 |
Since they will be unable to get gigabit speeds from the internet, I was planning on keeping the internal network between the work stations and the server on gigabit and the connection to the internet on a normal 100mbps router. Here is the layout I have designed. DSL Modem ---> Router (100mbps Lan, 54mbps WAN) ---> Netgear gigabit switch (4 work stations connect to this switch) --------> Netgear gigabit switch (4 work stations connect to this switch) --------> Netgear gigabit switch (two work stations and the server connect to this switch) Based on that primitive drawing i hope you can see what i am talking about. All the workstations have gigabit network adaptors except for two stations on the wirless connection. All I am looking for is gigabit speeds between the 10 main work stations and the server. Using the layout I have above, will that work or will the router keep everything set back to 100mbps? |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 09:55 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Ruler of Omicron Persei 8 Posts: 20,868 From: kn-ARGH!-xville Tenn-ARGH!-see OS: 3.1, 95, 98SE, xp, 2000, NT4, 2003 Standard Edition, linux (various flavors) |
are you plugging the switches into each other? or into seperate ports on the router?
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:01 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Geek in Training ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 201 From: Kansas City OS: Vista Ultimate, XP Pro, Win 2000 Pro, Ubuntu 6.10 |
Al the switches are plugged into each other with ony the first switch being plugged into the router.
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:05 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Ruler of Omicron Persei 8 Posts: 20,868 From: kn-ARGH!-xville Tenn-ARGH!-see OS: 3.1, 95, 98SE, xp, 2000, NT4, 2003 Standard Edition, linux (various flavors) |
why? not enough ports on the router?
...i would imagine you're not going to be going past the 100 meter mark in this network right? i'd actually suggest getting a single switch with enough ports to connect all your machines...you've got 10 workstations and a server...plust the router connection....a 12 port switch would fit exactly....but a 24 port would allow for expansion and would probably be cheaper than buying multiple switches..... daisy chaining switches the way you're suggesting is doable...and functional....but...it can cause certain problems (i.e. you're basically building a bus network..so if the first switch breaks...then any computer connected to the 3rd switch now loses connections) |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:09 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Geek in Training ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 201 From: Kansas City OS: Vista Ultimate, XP Pro, Win 2000 Pro, Ubuntu 6.10 |
I considered that. However I am going to be using the gigabit switches to replace the exsisting switches on the network. I was going to run all new cables to the different work stations, but the business is on a tight budget and doesn't want to pay for the new cable and the hours i would be working to accomplish that task.
I assumed that since all internal computers were connected to nothing but the gigabit switches that they would get the gigabit connection and only run into a slower connection at the router when connecting to the internet. This post has been edited by RjBass: Sep 11 2007, 10:11 AM |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:11 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 595 From: england! OS: Vista XPS 720 |
yer as dsenette said plugging switches in to each other isnt a great idea so either plug them in to the router of y a big switch
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:49 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Ruler of Omicron Persei 8 Posts: 20,868 From: kn-ARGH!-xville Tenn-ARGH!-see OS: 3.1, 95, 98SE, xp, 2000, NT4, 2003 Standard Edition, linux (various flavors) |
QUOTE I considered that. However I am going to be using the gigabit switches to replace the exsisting switches on the network. I was going to run all new cables to the different work stations, but the business is on a tight budget and doesn't want to pay for the new cable and the hours i would be working to accomplish that task. all of that is correct...like i said...you can in fact go the way you're wanting...it's just not suggested...I assumed that since all internal computers were connected to nothing but the gigabit switches that they would get the gigabit connection and only run into a slower connection at the router when connecting to the internet. you're basically adding more points of failure in the system than are required....you might be able to convince them to shell out the extra cash if you can give them the proper info on the options...but...whatever the customer wants right? |
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:53 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Geek in Training ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 201 From: Kansas City OS: Vista Ultimate, XP Pro, Win 2000 Pro, Ubuntu 6.10 |
Thanks for the feedback.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies / Views | Topic Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
5 / 431 | 16th April 2006 - 01:15 PM rxkevco started - last by rxkevco |
|||||
![]() |
7 / 364 | 5th November 2006 - 12:15 PM Cabranth started - last by Dan1887 |
|||||
![]() |
4 / 441 | 10th May 2008 - 12:01 PM Toonsquad started - last by Boern88 |
|||||
![]() |
9 / 406 | 28th April 2008 - 05:06 PM Toonsquad started - last by stettybet0 |
|||||
|
Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 08:37 AM |
| Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. The forum is run by volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We make every attempt to ensure that the help and advice posted is accurate and will not cause harm to your computer. However, we do not guarantee that they are accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. |