Welcome Guest ( Log In | Join )

Discover the best free computer help!
Learn more about Geeks to Go by taking the tour. Want to ask a question, reply to a topic, or remove all advertising? It's easy, fast and free. Join today!
Spyware, virus, trojan, fake security or privacy alerts? Please start with our malware cleaning guide.
     
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Win 98 won't recognize slave hard drive, windows 98 95 hard drives
reddogracing
post Sep 20 2005, 07:33 PM
Post #1


New Member
*
Posts: 2
OS: win 98



I put a hard drive from a win 95 machine in a win 98 machine as a slave hard drive o nthe primar IDE channel. Windows won't recognize the added drive. Bios finds it with no problem, and windows knows it's there (e.g. it shows up in device manager, but without a drive letter), it just won't access it. I believe the win 95 hard drive is FAT16, and the 98 drive is FAT32. Any ideas as to how I can get the system to access the new (win 95) drive? I would like to get the data off of it. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pip22
post Sep 21 2005, 03:23 AM
Post #2


Trusted Tech
Group Icon
Posts: 2,663
OS: Windows XP



Only reason I can think of, provided you've set the drive's jumper to slave, is that there are no partitions on the drive --- so no drive letter.
Incidentally, Device Manager doesn't show drive letters - that's normal.
You only see drive letters in Windows Explorer/My Computer. Try booting in to pure DOS (not a DOS window), then type FDISK and from the menu choose the option see the partition details for that drive, just to confirm that it does have at least one partition. And while your in DOS, log on to that drive and type DIR to see if DOS can access the drive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
reddogracing
post Sep 21 2005, 04:36 AM
Post #3


New Member
*
Posts: 2
OS: win 98



Fdisk from DOS mode:

Partition: 1
Status: A
Type: Non-DOS
Volume Label: (blank)
Mbytes: 1032
System: (blank)
Usage: 100%

It doesn't have a drive letter assigned under DOS either.
The drive functioned perfectly well in another machine underWindows 95 before I put it in this machine. Is it possible it has some sort of drive management software (Western Digital) to allow a large drive under Win 95 that's messing thiings up? Or can the FAT16 vs. FAT 32 be messing things up?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tyger
post Sep 21 2005, 02:04 PM
Post #4


Member 2k
*****
Posts: 2,894
OS: win98, xp, winME



It's possible that it might have fat12 or earlier. If win95 was installed over 3.1 and that was installed over dos, which it has to be, then 98 will have trouble with it. I just had such a drive with that and it had compressed files as well, and win98 couldn't work with it. Even fidsk and format couldn't deal with it. I had to write it to zeros in another machine to resinstall dos and WfW. If you can network the two machines you can probably get your files out. Otherwise if they aren't too large use floppies.

PS: I just rememberd that you may have a file conversion utility.

This post has been edited by Tyger: Sep 21 2005, 02:05 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies / Views Topic Information
No New Posts   7 / 425 25th February 2006 - 07:28 AM
plehsdeen started - last by ZEUS_GB
No New Posts   12 / 470 13th April 2006 - 06:30 PM
wemibelec90 started - last by wemibelec90
No New Posts   6 / 502 14th April 2007 - 02:03 PM
CrankyCheryl started - last by CrankyCheryl
No New Posts   1 / 2,811 1st March 2008 - 05:19 PM
thefranks5 started - last by pip22

RSS Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 11:15 AM
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. The forum is run by volunteers who donate their time and expertise. We make every attempt to ensure that the help and advice posted is accurate and will not cause harm to your computer. However, we do not guarantee that they are accurate and they are to be used at your own risk.