High, the idea sounds great but remember that a P2P is something one doesn't want to remain too faithful for too long to, the reason being twofold: the choice dries up and also because one never knows who might be building up a record of your habits, even if those habits are legit one would still have to explain oneself if for example one had something ripped in ones shared folder arriving under another name. So whereas one would want to retain ones ICR connection throughout thus not losing ones friends, the same approach should not be taken towards ones P2P. Simply put: a P2P is someone elses wife.
The site is correct in not supporting ilegal downloading nor the use of ilegal copying but probably not simple because it has to be on the side of big business nor of having its own self presevation in mind, - no, more hopefully it is becasue it is genuinly on the side of the little guy who, knowing nothing about P2Ps, is mislead by us here into thinking that he has been given a license to rip, well that may be true until he is caught and forced to pay, or worse his family has to pay, oh and have you seen the fines they are giving out now; moreover, can one ask at this point how long it will be before big business realises that they can make more money from fining people for P2Ps abuse out of court than selling their products in the first place, of which, judging from what one see in news of late, grounds for this speculation may already be apparent.