HDD and Raid?
Started by
cheema
, Mar 06 2006 11:44 PM
#1
Posted 06 March 2006 - 11:44 PM
#2
Posted 07 March 2006 - 12:33 AM
RAID0 will give you a theoretical advantage when loading games, but the actual difference is really only noticed when moving very large files (like video editing). The common advice now is that RAID is not practical for desktop use. The extra drive doubles the heat, power, and most importantly chance of data loss.
I do run a system with RAID0, and I can tell you the performance difference is underwhelming.
I do run a system with RAID0, and I can tell you the performance difference is underwhelming.
#3
Posted 07 March 2006 - 08:39 AM
I was looking for a stand alone drive and found one with SATA 3.0Gb/s with 8MB Cache and the other was SerialATA150 with 16MB Cache. Which one would be faster?
#4
Posted 07 March 2006 - 09:11 AM
The larger cache will be faster.
#5
Posted 07 March 2006 - 09:21 AM
The 16Mb cache though is quite common on SATAII drives you should be able to find one.
#6
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:04 AM
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users