Video card to run Oblivion when it comes out...
Posted 19 April 2006 - 03:24 PM
Posted 19 April 2006 - 03:25 PM
Posted 19 April 2006 - 04:13 PM
I would get rid of that big sig image allready, you know not even good bragging rights, some of us have real military ranks and not from a game and everything a BF2 rank means nothing.
Hey zero you cant have everything max, it either no AA or no HDR, what did you pick?
Posted 19 April 2006 - 05:48 PM
I'm usually fine as long as everything is normal (so I couldn't stand purple water) and it runs at at least 25 FPS.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 12:10 AM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 02:07 AM
My spec are as followed:
AMD 3500+ ((2.2Ghz) overclocked to 2.44Ghz)
1GB Corsair Budget ((400Mhz) overclocked to 444 Mhz)
256MB Geforce 6200 with turbocache ((memory: 450Mhz, core: 350Mhz) overclocked to memory: 721Mhz, and core: 465Mhz)
Power Supply: 500Watt
Motherboard: MSI K8n nForce4 SLI
Sony DVD/CD Burner
CD burner with DVD combo
Windows XP Pro with all the latest updates.
If you can just give me an idea of how the game will run or even if it will be playable that would be great.
PS I will be upgrading to the new 7900GTX when I can afford it but till then im left with this.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 04:33 AM
6200 should run it, not fantasitcally well but it will run and the 7900GTX will run it.
Cashetti ive been gaming alot longer than you have. And you know BF2 isnt even that popular, not even close to the originals popularity, just not that great a game it didnt live up to its hype.
Ive got an extra stripe and a crown in real life, no one really cares its just another huge image to load.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:09 AM
I was truly disappointed with bf2, id rather play battlefield 1942
Posted 20 April 2006 - 08:11 AM
Im a sargent in BF2, havent really even played it that much. I too was disappointed with BF2 (waste of $50), bf1942, In my opinion, was WAY more groundbreaking and a lot more fun, ( I got banned from the tech tv lanparty, bf1942 demo, cuz I was owning the other team too hard 30-0, in the first 5 min) the vehicles are more video game friendly (easier to control). I'm guessing that BF2 was supposed to be more like a sim. rather than a arcade style shooter. I do like the commander screen, but the controls are more difficult to map, and rather confusing at first. It is a pretty game but, if theyre going to make a simulator make it realistic, it wouldnt take 5 or more bullets to drop someone, maybe 3 TOPS and that would be from a .223 (m4a1,m16). That and the aircraft controls arent as responsive as bf1942 even with sensitivity set to max. But, thats enough of that.
Edited by p-zero, 20 April 2006 - 08:15 AM.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 08:59 AM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:06 AM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:07 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users