This is one of the problems using publisher, front page, word or M$ specific product to make web pages in the manner of what you see, is what you get. It does not always work in other browsers. If you can, I would try to get Dreamweaver 8 or a free WYSIWYG Editor like NVU
As for the images. I saved the image as called out in the source code from both browser's. Both images look just like the one in Firefox ( http://oregonjacks.5...s/image2891.gif
) when viewed in a graphics editor. Publisher may allow IE to clean up the image by using the publisher's code that FF ignores. Right now I really can not explain this. Maybe someone else would be willing to give an opinion or why the difference. Either way, the original image looks like what FF shows in all the graphics editors I used. Possibly the photo needs to be save in another format and then used, checked in FF.