Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Geeks To Go is a helpful hub, where thousands of volunteer geeks quickly serve friendly answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice from the experts. Register now to gain access to all of our features, it's FREE and only takes one minute. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more.

Create Account How it Works
Photo

Spamhaus stays online after legal action fails


  • Please log in to reply

#1
Retired Tech

Retired Tech

    Retired Staff

  • Retired Staff
  • 20,563 posts
Spamhaus, a leading UK anti-spam service, will continue to operate after a US court rejected an attempt to take it offline last week.

Spamhaus provides lists of known spammers to businesses, enabling them to block junk mail in their incoming email traffic. It was taken to Court by e360 Insight, an email marketing company, which Spamhaus had added to its spam blacklist.

e360 told an Illinois court earlier this month that the spamhaus.org domain should be suspended, after it won a claim for damages against Spamhaus.

But in the Illinois Court last Thursday, the judge rejected e360's request for suspension.

Judge Charles Kocoras said that the relief e360 sought was "too broad to be warranted in this case", and that unproportional effects could be caused by suspending Spamhaus' service.

In a Court statement, Kocoras said, "The suspension would cut off all lawful online activities of Spamhaus via its existing domain name, not just those that are in contravention of this Court's order."

"While we will not condone or tolerate noncompliance with a valid order of this court, neither will we impose a sanction that does not correspond to the gravity of the offending conduct," the judge continued.

Some businesses had been concerned that if the Spamhaus service was suspended, the quantity of spam on the internet could have increased dramatically. Spamhaus claims it is responsible for stopping 50 billion spam messages a day.

Spamhaus is also disputing the $11.7m (£6.25m) damages that the Illinois Court has ordered it to pay, saying that the Court has no jurisdiction over a UK-based company.

After the award, e360 chief David Linhardt branded Spamhaus as "a fanatical, vigilante organisation that operates in the United States with blatant disregard for US law".

Internet registrar ICANN said earlier this month that it would not suspend the Spamhaus domain
  • 0

Advertisements


#2
jaxisland

jaxisland

    Member 1K

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,703 posts
Wow, the first time in a long time a US court made a good decision! :whistling:
  • 0

#3
Dan1887

Dan1887

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 161 posts
And a bad one at the same time the server is based outside the u.s. and so u.s has no jurisdiction.
  • 0

#4
danny3793

danny3793

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
It seems as if Spam companies have gotten more beligerant =\. Im gonna have to give them a visit, I get about 500 spam emails a day....I would think spam would be illegal as its pretty much harrasment. Am i correct on this? I mean, The same should be considered with telemarketers. My phone company told me they wouldnt sell my home phone number, and about a week later im recieving phone calls from telemarketing companies, And my phone company denies selling my number...Anyhow, Go spamhaus.org!
  • 0

#5
ZEUS_GB

ZEUS_GB

    There's no school like old school!

  • Retired Staff
  • 1,668 posts
79.1% of all the email our mail server at work gets is SPAM. We use spamhaus as one of our filters and it does a very good job.

The Spamhaus service is free for anyone in the whole world to use so technically they aren't specifically targetting the US market and the server isn't even in the US.
At the end of the day a US court has absolutely no jurisdiction over a UK company and this ruling is complete nonsense.

It's a sad state of affairs when the people that send SPAM can start suing non-profit organisations that are simply trying to help.
  • 0






Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP