Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Geeks To Go is a helpful hub, where thousands of volunteer geeks quickly serve friendly answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice from the experts. Register now to gain access to all of our features, it's FREE and only takes one minute. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more.

Create Account How it Works
Photo

Windows Vista marketing 'deceived' consumers


  • Please log in to reply

#1
Retired Tech

Retired Tech

    Retired Staff

  • Retired Staff
  • 20,563 posts
Microsoft has been accused of deceiving US consumers by marketing PCs as "Windows Vista Capable" when they could only run the most basic version of its latest operating system.

A US lawsuit filed today claims Microsoft overstated the ability of PCs to run Windows Vista, and that an upgrade program added insult to injury by giving users access to Windows Vista Home Basic that lacked many of the advertised features.

The suit, filed in the Western District of Washington, is seeking class-action status for 10,000 people and damages in excess of $5m.

The suit, Microsoft's latest class action case but the first related to Windows Vista, comes amid claims that most business PCs also lack the hardware required to run most versions of Windows Vista.

Eighty per cent of PCs do not match Microsoft's hardware requirements to upgrade, according to Everdream, a desktop management specialist. The biggest hurdle is lack of RAM: 70 per cent of machines lack the requisite 1GB, according to Everdream, which surveyed 140,000 desktop and laptop machines.

http://uk.news.yahoo...on-d1d76f9.html
  • 0

Advertisements


#2
Chicken mania

Chicken mania

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
Huh, that's the reason why I dual booted WinXP with Ubuntu. Why pay a bazillion dollars to upgrade to Vista when XP does just fine? Besides, how many people actually do their work while running all that eye candy? Most of my friends(even the almost software incompetent ones) usually turn on Windows Classic because themes are really a hog.

edit: Besides, Vista is still new. I'd rather wait till Vista sp2 to upgrade, which would be around 1 to 2 years from now.

Edited by Chicken mania, 08 April 2007 - 03:27 AM.

  • 0

#3
synonymous

synonymous

    New Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
Frivolous lawsuit if you ask me. Businesses should research an OS before purchasing it, regular consumers as well. The Specs are on the box, aren't they? (that's a serious question, my laptop came with vista pre-installed and an anytime upgrade disc to home premium). I'm not usually one to defend Microsoft (can't really stand Microsoft, what with that bill that they (tried?) to get passed that would allow them to search any computer randomly, whenever they wanted), but it is not Microsoft's problem that people don't have good computers.
  • 0

#4
Chicken mania

Chicken mania

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Frivolous lawsuit if you ask me. Businesses should research an OS before purchasing it, regular consumers as well. The Specs are on the box, aren't they? (that's a serious question, my laptop came with vista pre-installed and an anytime upgrade disc to home premium). I'm not usually one to defend Microsoft (can't really stand Microsoft, what with that bill that they (tried?) to get passed that would allow them to search any computer randomly, whenever they wanted), but it is not Microsoft's problem that people don't have good computers.


However, I strongly suspect that many of the businesses who put Vista on the boxes were privvy to this issue. After all, they get a cut of the profit and from what I know about many branded pcs, the full specifications are not always listed on the box. Instead, one sometimes gets a listing like this:

- Meet your multimedia needs with leading graphics technology
- Fully-featured 2.1 sound quality
- Edit your photos quickly and easily
- Stable storage
- Supports WinXP/Vista (Usually, "supports" means more like "might be able to run")

And then sometimes in addition to that, you get a more detailed listing:

- 40gb hard disk (many times it's PATA not even SATA)
- ATI/Nvidia graphics card(usually this means integrated graphics chip, not really a graphics card)
- 256 mb ram(I've learnt that many makers use onboard graphics cards and thus, this figure often includes memory shared by other components and sometimes, it's Sdram, not even DDR. Or if it's DDR, quite often, it's CL3 not even 2.5.)
- In-built microphone(probably some shoddy build that crackles too often)
- Intel Pentium 4 1.6 ghz(or sometimes, they don't list the processor at all)

Often, the detailed listing doesn't include much of the hardware and you'd probably have to open up the casing(thus voiding the warranty) or run some software like Everest or even Speedfan or Sandra Sisoft. But how many people know anything about such procedures?
  • 0






Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP