[cuzant]

sorry but on my (quite old comp ) it would have took forever on IE sorry

[Advertisements]

131
127
129
128

I live in California BTW.

[MoNsTeReNeRgY22]

131
127
129
128

I live in California BTW.

[harrythook]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Harry>ping 216.239.0.201

Pinging 216.239.0.201 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=42
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=43
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=43
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=42

Ping statistics for 216.239.0.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 85ms, Maximum = 88ms, Average = 86ms

6:00 AM with 3 machines connected to the pipe (comcast)
Philadelphia

[Troy]

Oh that sucks, I missed it!

[BHowett]

Congratulations Geeks to Go, on reaching the 1 million post milestone!!!!!!!

WOW I missed a lot... Congrats wannabe1 for the 1,000,000 th post, and thanks to everyone here that made it possible.


ohh yeh here is my Pinging of 216.239.0.201

Pinging 216.239.0.201 [216.239.0.201]:

Ping #1: Got reply from 216.239.0.201 in 39ms [TTL=50]
Ping #2: Got reply from 216.239.0.201 in 39ms [TTL=50]
Ping #3: Got reply from 216.239.0.201 in 38ms [TTL=50]
Ping #4: Got reply from 216.239.0.201 in 39ms [TTL=50]


Variation: 0.9ms (+/- 2%)

Shortest Time: 38ms
Average: 39ms
Longest Time: 39ms

Done pinging 216.239.0.201!

location - Richmond VA, USA

[Salku69]

109
109
109
125

Im also in cali

[Troy]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Troy>ping 216.239.0.201

Pinging 216.239.0.201 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=239ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 216.239.0.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 239ms, Maximum = 241ms, Average = 240ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Troy>ping 216.239.0.201

Pinging 216.239.0.201 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=48
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 216.239.0.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 240ms, Maximum = 241ms, Average = 240ms

Okay I'm in Australia, so what does this mean? I did it twice just to be certain...

[admin]

Okay I'm in Australia, so what does this mean? I did it twice just to be certain...

It only means you're a LONG way from the server, and even the speed of light has limitations.

If you'd like to try a comparison, our current IP is 72.232.135.10

[admin]

Okay I'm in Australia, so what does this mean? I did it twice just to be certain...

It only means you're a LONG way from the server, and even the speed of light has limitations.

If you'd like to try a comparison, our current IP is 72.232.135.10

[Titan8990]

From Kentucky:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Jordan>ping 72.232.135.10

Pinging 72.232.135.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 72.232.135.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 37ms

[keithr128]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Keith>ping 216.239.0.201

Pinging 216.239.0.201 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=44
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=44
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=44
Reply from 216.239.0.201: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=44

Ping statistics for 216.239.0.201:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 115ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 116ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Keith>ping 72.232.135.10

Pinging 72.232.135.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=50
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 72.232.135.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 51ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Keith>

[BHowett]

So ....ahhhh what do we talk about for the next million posts ?

[Troy]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Troy>ping 72.232.135.10

Pinging 72.232.135.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=231ms TTL=45
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=45
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=229ms TTL=45
Reply from 72.232.135.10: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=45

Ping statistics for 72.232.135.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 224ms, Maximum = 233ms, Average = 229ms

There you go admin, it looks pretty similar to me, just a little (VERY little) bit quicker in the "time" section...

Does this mean my internet connection is good? I think it's good, I like my ISP

[==SpuD==]

Congrats on reaching 1 million posts !!!!!!!!!!!!


Heres the ping thing
171
154
163
152

im in the UK btw

[Kat]

Oh that sucks, I missed it!

Tell me about it. I knew I would miss it though, since I was offline all weekend at the Lake.

Congratulations, Blair for reaching 1 million posts on your "little hobby" site. And a special THANK YOU to all STaff and members who have made this possible. What an amazing accomplishment this is!!