Not Sure Vista 64 or 32 bits or get xp?
#1
Posted 07 December 2007 - 02:03 PM
#2
Posted 07 December 2007 - 07:00 PM
Can you list your full specs so that I can see if its worth getting 64-bit? Thanks
Soorena
#3
Posted 07 December 2007 - 08:02 PM
Also, as for your old files, they all will work on 64-bit Vista unless they use a very old 16-bit program. However, none of your basic music, photos, and documents should require such a program.
Also, to determine what type of Windows you have (are you sure you are technically inclined enough to build your own computer? ), go to My Computer, then go to File>Properties. It should say somewhere on there.
To SOORENA, I was wondering what specifically you were looking for in his specs. He said he was planning to get at least 4GB of RAM at some point, and that his CPU was 64-bit compatible, so what else could you be looking for?
Edited by stettybet0, 07 December 2007 - 08:03 PM.
#4
Posted 07 December 2007 - 09:58 PM
Hi,
Can you list your full specs so that I can see if its worth getting 64-bit? Thanks
Soorena
same as the last stuff i posted http://www.geekstogo...r...30&start=30
except
Prcessor:
MoBo
#5
Posted 07 December 2007 - 10:59 PM
Basically, get 64-bit if you want to make your system more future-proof and be able to use 4+GB of RAM. Get 32-bit if the above reasons aren't important to you, or you have older programs or hardware which require it.
Of course, if you buy a retail package of Vista, it comes with both the 64-bit and 32-bit DVDs, so you can try out both.
#6
Posted 07 December 2007 - 11:06 PM
Yes thats another way to put why i wanted vista..future proof xD....i just wished linksys would make a driver to make the wmp54gx comptible... i like cuz you can move the antenna stand were ever and i never get d/cI still don't see what your specs (other than a 64-bit CPU and the amount of RAM, as I previously stated) have to do with anything.
Basically, get 64-bit if you want to make your system more future-proof and be able to use 4+GB of RAM. Get 32-bit if the above reasons aren't important to you, or you have older programs or hardware which require it.
Of course, if you buy a retail package of Vista, it comes with both the 64-bit and 32-bit DVDs, so you can try out both.
#7
Posted 07 December 2007 - 11:14 PM
#8
Posted 08 December 2007 - 01:06 AM
#9
Posted 08 December 2007 - 11:12 AM
#10
Posted 08 December 2007 - 04:26 PM
even if i get a oem version and not retail? i heard you would have to get a new mobo if i wanted differnt versionSure you could. If you install XP now, when you want to upgrade to Vista (32-bit or 64-bit) you could simply install Vista and get rid of XP, or create a separate partition for Vista and dual-boot with both of them.
#11
Posted 08 December 2007 - 09:37 PM
#12
Posted 09 December 2007 - 07:10 AM
Sounds like you've hit the nail on the head when it comes to Microsoft's licensing requirements If you get the retail version, there is no problem.Both of these scenarios would be possible with (an) OEM version(s) of XP and/or Vista. You most certainly do not need to get a new motherboard in order to install a new operating system. That doesn't even come close to making a remote amount of sense.
#13
Posted 09 December 2007 - 12:48 PM
I find it odd that your wmp54gx would be incompatible with 64-bit Vista, when my wmp54gs (nearly identical product) worked fine for me; Vista even installed drivers for it by itself.
Also, as for your old files, they all will work on 64-bit Vista unless they use a very old 16-bit program. However, none of your basic music, photos, and documents should require such a program.
Also, to determine what type of Windows you have (are you sure you are technically inclined enough to build your own computer? ), go to My Computer, then go to File>Properties. It should say somewhere on there.
To SOORENA, I was wondering what specifically you were looking for in his specs. He said he was planning to get at least 4GB of RAM at some point, and that his CPU was 64-bit compatible, so what else could you be looking for?
Sorry I didn't notice you asked, I didn't know his specs so I just wanted to see if its even compatible with 64-bit, thats pretty much it, Oh and if it was a CPU that was really bad like an Athlon 3800 then it wouldn't make a world of a difference if you get 64 bit or 32 bit.
Soorena
#14
Posted 10 December 2007 - 07:46 PM
There have been 64bit CPU's since the early 1990's, regardless of what AMD claimed (yes, another marketing gimic). An example, N64 ran on a 64bit processor.I didn't know his specs so I just wanted to see if its even compatible with 64-bit
A CPU shouldn't have any effect on whether or not you get a 32bit or 64bit operating system. A newer processor will have no additional advantages on a 64bit OS that it would not have on a 32bit OS.Oh and if it was a CPU that was really bad like an Athlon 3800 then it wouldn't make a world of a difference if you get 64 bit or 32 bit.
I believe the OP is a little confused here, OEM operating systems are directly linked to your motherboard. If you have a OEM license and want to swap your motherboard, you need a new license.Both of these scenarios would be possible with (an) OEM version(s) of XP and/or Vista. You most certainly do not need to get a new motherboard in order to install a new operating system. That doesn't even come close to making a remote amount of sense.
James
Edited by james_8970, 10 December 2007 - 07:46 PM.
#15
Posted 10 December 2007 - 09:51 PM
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users