Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Geeks To Go is a helpful hub, where thousands of volunteer geeks quickly serve friendly answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice from the experts. Register now to gain access to all of our features, it's FREE and only takes one minute. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more.

Create Account How it Works

Is an FSB:DRAM ratio of 2:3 or 4:5 OK?

  • Please log in to reply




  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
Hi, I have an Intel E6600 (266MHz FSB) and 4x512MB of OCZ PC-6400 (800MHz) RAM stable at 4-5-4-15. This means that my "FSB speed:DRAM speed" ratio is 2:3 (266MHz:400MHz). CPU-Z calls it "DRAM" - is that the same as "memory bus"? Anyway, what does a 2:3 ratio actually mean for my system, am I losing some performance?
I can reduce the memory bus speed to 333 (which would equal a 4:5 ratio) or even 266 (which is 1:1), but that seems like a waste of money on the RAM front, because my 4 sticks would all effectively become PC-4200 rather than PC-6400...., but would a 1:1 ratio be "better" somehow than 2:3?

I am not trying to overclock anything at all, I just don't really get the whole "timings" thing....

Many thanks
  • 0




    Tech Staff

  • Technician
  • 1,323 posts
Hello and welcome to Geeks to Go!

DRAM is Dynamic Random Access Memory. The memory bus is the bus that runs from the CPU to the memory expansion slots. To answer your question, no they are not the same thing.

In computers, your system is only as fast as the slowest component. If your FSB is only running at 266 MHz, your memory can only operate at 266 MHz, no matter what you have it set at. So you pretty much don't really have any advantage with 2:3 or 4:5.

Hope this answers your questions,

  • 0

Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP