Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Need help with your computer or device? Want to learn new tech skills? You're in the right place!
Geeks to Go is a friendly community of tech experts who can solve any problem you have. Just create a free account and post your question. Our volunteers will reply quickly and guide you through the steps. Don't let tech troubles stop you. Join Geeks to Go now and get the support you need!

How it Works Create Account
Photo

OMG! The end of online stupidity?


  • Please log in to reply

#1
frantique

frantique

    Member 2k

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,700 posts

Finally, software developers are building a filter that blocks unintelligible comments
(Fortune Magazine) -- Internet veterans have long complained about the steady erosion of civility -- and worse, intelligence -- in online discourse. Initially the phenomenon seemed to be a seasonal disorder. It occurred every September when freshmen showed up for college and went online. Tasting for the first time the freedom and power of the Internet, the newbies would behave like a bunch of drunken fraternity pledges, filling electronic bulletin boards with puerile remarks until the upperclassmen could whip them into shape.
Things took a dramatic turn for the worse in 1993, when AOL (Charts, Fortune 500) loosed its tens of thousands -- and then millions -- of users onto the Net. The event came to be known as the Endless September, and true to its name, it continues to this day.
It's a serious problem. Fools and bandwidth hogs have a way of driving traffic away from the most successful online destinations, a phenomenon that could ruin the emerging social networks and user-generated aggregators like Digg.
But there's still hope for intelligent life on the Internet. A team of software developers is hard at work on a "stupid filter" that promises to do to idiotic online comments what a spam filter does to junk and unwanted e-mail: put it in a place where it can't hurt anyone anymore.

Read more
(Ref. CNNMoney Fortune)
  • 0

Advertisements


#2
Major Payne

Major Payne

    Retired Staff

  • Retired Staff
  • 5,307 posts
****Notice: Ron's comments were filtered by the new stupid filter installed on GTG! :)
  • 0

#3
PsychPosse

PsychPosse

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 322 posts

****Notice: Ron's comments were filtered by the new stupid filter installed on GTG! :)



:) Good one!
  • 0

#4
Chopin

Chopin

    Member 2k

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,639 posts
Now that's good software. I'd actually pay to buy that.

*Fredil Yupigo didn't want to pay for his version of XP. Nevertheless, he did.

Edited by Fredil Yupigo, 07 January 2008 - 09:08 PM.

  • 0

#5
dsenette

dsenette

    Je suis Napoléon!

  • Community Leader
  • 26,047 posts
  • MVP

Now that's good software. I'd actually pay to buy that.

......isn't that the basic concept behind buying something?....the paying for it that is....:)
  • 0

#6
Chopin

Chopin

    Member 2k

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,639 posts
Well, yes... but there's just some stuff you don't want to pay for, no matter how much you need it.
  • 0

#7
Murray S.

Murray S.

    Trusted Tech

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,513 posts
  • MVP

Well, yes... but there's just some stuff you don't want to pay for, no matter how much you need it.


Then you really don't need it now do you! If you needed it bad enough, you would buy it.

Murray
  • 0

#8
Chopin

Chopin

    Member 2k

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,639 posts
True :)
  • 0






Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP