Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Need help with your computer or device? Want to learn new tech skills? You're in the right place!
Geeks to Go is a friendly community of tech experts who can solve any problem you have. Just create a free account and post your question. Our volunteers will reply quickly and guide you through the steps. Don't let tech troubles stop you. Join Geeks to Go now and get the support you need!

How it Works Create Account
Photo

Underperforming graphics card - I think :S


  • Please log in to reply

#16
Troy

Troy

    Tech Staff

  • Technician
  • 8,841 posts
Isn't WOW an online game? Slow internet would obviously affect your performance, no?
  • 0

Advertisements


#17
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
it would affect latency only, and when i say slowed down i mean slowed down, not slow, im still getting like 2-3mb from my usual 5mb
  • 0

#18
Artellos

Artellos

    Tech Secretary

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,915 posts
Hello icikle,

I see that you have the "Anisotropic filtering" set to 8x.

Here's a quote from the NVIDIA Control Panel:

Description:
Anisotropic texture filtering affects the crispness of textures.

Typical usage scenarios:
* The image will be less blurred at higher settings, however, you may experience a decrease in performance
* If the application has it's own anisotropic filtering controls, it is recommended to use the application-controlled settings

I believe that if you set this to "Application Controlled" you might see an increase in FPS.
I'm looking forward to hearing from you :)

Regards,
Olrik
  • 0

#19
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
I would say there is a very slight increase in performance, i consistently get 30fps in busy cities and about 40-50 elsewhere, but is the maximum 60fps, cos i hear tales from ppl who get like 100fps in quiet areas and i cant get over 60, also would the multisampling colour depth on my resolution make a diff?
  • 0

#20
Artellos

Artellos

    Tech Secretary

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,915 posts
Hey icikle,

Yes, it would make a difference.
In the Resolutions Tab of the Video settings, is Virtual Sync turned on or off?
What Color setting are you currently using?

Regards,
Olrik
  • 0

#21
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
Virtual sync is ticked which i believe means its on.
Refresh rate is 8x
Multisampling is : 24bit colour 24bit depth 1x multisampling
Im using desktop gamma
  • 0

#22
Artellos

Artellos

    Tech Secretary

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,915 posts
Try turning off the Virtual Sync
That refresh rate doesn't sound familiar
Doesn't it say "60Hz" (possibly a different number)

Regards,
Olrik
  • 0

#23
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
it doesnt seem to make any difference
  • 0

#24
Artellos

Artellos

    Tech Secretary

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,915 posts
And the refresh rate?

Regards,
Olrik
  • 0

#25
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
60hz
  • 0

Advertisements


#26
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
i think vertical sync may have fixed it, im now getting 216fps in quiet areas
  • 0

#27
Artellos

Artellos

    Tech Secretary

  • Global Moderator
  • 3,915 posts
Good to hear :) I thought it might be virtual sync.
It 'binds' the FPS to the refresh rate of the monitor.

Glad to be of help! :)

Regards,
Olrik
  • 0

#28
icikle

icikle

    Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts
thanks
  • 0






Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP