I think CCleaner is best used immediately after installing Windows, then fairly regularly after that as part of a preventative maintenance plan. Again, not as a fix procedure. So don't go saying I recommend them. I don't for most people as they have caused problems, and reason for the MR folks concerns.
Frequent BSODs - No Entry in Event Viewer
#31
Posted 25 September 2009 - 09:41 PM
I think CCleaner is best used immediately after installing Windows, then fairly regularly after that as part of a preventative maintenance plan. Again, not as a fix procedure. So don't go saying I recommend them. I don't for most people as they have caused problems, and reason for the MR folks concerns.
#32
Posted 25 September 2009 - 11:27 PM
BUT ANYWAYS.. now im just venting..
how long you think memtest should run to get a good picture of the memory's status?
#33
Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:42 AM
That's immaterial and we hear that all the time. Someone swaps out a PSU and suddenly they call themself a "technician". It took me more than 2 years of extensive tech schools, follow-on training, and a year of on-the-job training before I could call myself a technician. Folks tell us they keep their systems clean of malware, only to find out they are 2 patches behind, still running IE6, and disabled their real-time AV because it was slowing them down, insisting their infestation has nothing to do with their P2P software and filesharing practices.I had made it plenty known that i had a pretty good idea of what it was that i was doing
So saying you know computers or you know security does not cut it, and the MR folks cannot simply accept their word, any more than I can accept someone who has "assembled" a few parts together into a PC is now a hardware expert, in spite of their claims.
So the MR folks have a very valid point - brought about because of bad past experiences, often from poorly developed registry cleaners long ago when they first started to appear, in the hands of wannabe experts. It is no fun cleaning up the mess some people make when they try to fix something themselves as often the aftermath of that is worse than the original ailment. But like many things over time, they improve and that includes registry cleaner. But when folks get stuck in their ways, and blinders go on, there's no convincing otherwise.
But to be fair, it IS better to err on the side of caution.
I've been told the same thing - but to be fair again, it is not my site. Most of these sites are owned by Malware Removal people. Their site, their rules, and that's fair. I admit, it really frustrates me sometimes because I am a hardware/electronics technician, but I've been supporting "secure" communications networks for decades and know a thing or two about security and malware removal - I just personally don't enjoy analyzing logs, after doing it day in and day out for the Air Force for many years, so I have never had the desire to go through one of the academies. I can and do analyze when necessary, but that is rarely necessary as the vast majority of malware problems can be resolved using conventional tools available to the normal user. But now I am venting.was told to either stop using reg cleaners all together and follow their instructions to the letter or stop fixing people's computer and go a different route in life
So, I have learned to deal with problems as I can, and if it looks like someone needs extended anti-malware help, I send them to the MR experts. And when they are done, or it looks like the problem is not a security issue, they send them back to us. The process does work, and since the idea is to help folks, we let it work.
As for MemTest, as noted, overnight is best, but if time is short, at least a couple complete "passes".
#34
Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:14 AM
but.. memtest.. i will go see if i can make a trip to the computer and get those results loaded.. I am almost positive they will be clean.. I dont think I am having a hardware issue.. I think some software is clashing. but i have been unable to figure out exactly what software that would be. it will be about 30 minutes before i can upload the memtest results though...
#35
Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:57 AM
test 8 pass 3 failing address 00117b8bf8c - 4475.5MB Good 9a12ac05 bad b521ac05 err-bits ff000000 count 1 chan -
Does that mean anything to you? or are we just going to say that memory is failing because memtest found an error?
#36
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:15 PM
I don't know exactly what that means, except it means trouble. Now you need to isolate which module is bad, if memtest didn't.test 8 pass 3 failing address 00117b8bf8c - 4475.5MB Good 9a12ac05 bad b521ac05 err-bits ff000000 count 1 chan -
Does that mean anything to you? or are we just going to say that memory is failing because memtest found an error?
#37
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:33 PM
i suppose best way to take one stick one (i have 2 2gb sticks) and run memtest for a while then put other one in by itself and run memtest for another lil while and see whaich give the error? or do you have a better way?
#38
Posted 26 September 2009 - 01:57 PM
#39
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:32 AM
i took out each stick one at a time and ran memtest for 3 full passes(about and hour and a half)
stick one slot one 3 pass 0 errors
stick two slot one 3 pass 0 errors
stick one slot two 3 pass 0 errors
stick two slot two 3 pass 0 errors
after getting this i put both the sticks back in except in the opposite slot
stick one in slot two and stick two in slot one: started giving errors immedialtely.. by the time the first pass got to 8% there were 210 errors and counting rapidly.
funny that i didnt get these errors originally or while testing the sticks indivually
I booted up windows and it still reports the full 3.5 GB that it had before (though there are 2 2gb sticks in there)
thoughts?
#40
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:14 AM
Seeing less than 4Gb on 32-bit systems is normal, as a chunk goes to system overhead. Some see less than 3Gb so you are doing fine there. As for your odd results, can't explain them, but I would be looking for another pair.
#41
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:23 AM
do you think that the memory is the cause of my bsod and lockups? i would really like to be sure before buying more.. i haven't had any oher problems that i would think would be memory related.. dont remember ever getting memory reference errors or such.. is there another way we can test to be sure?
what is a good overall stress test application? i used to have one but have forgotten what it was..
#42
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:42 PM
That's my guess. Try running with just 1 and see if it crashes.do you think that the memory is the cause of my bsod and lockups?
I don't blame you - but there really is no positive test one way or the other, except, perhaps, at the RAM maker's factor.i would really like to be sure before buying more..
See Prime 95 for a stress test. You might try testing your RAM with Microsoft's tester too - see my earlier post.
#43
Posted 28 September 2009 - 06:48 AM
actually i am on it right now and it seems to be running pretty smoothly for the time being. I just read a post in a different forum of someone else with basically the same build as me that is having the same trouble. But there was no answer to his question. It seems that with the 4gb kit (2x2gb) of patriot extreme RAM with my current build (Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600) that there is something preventing the memory sticks from working together.
here is the specific post i was reading from: link
though i have yet to run prime95 or the windows memory thingy im not sure that either of them will give helpful results. Can you think of any way i could figure out why exactly these two sticks seem to hate each other of if they are truely going bad?
Again I am not so sure that they are going bad because they went through memtest just fine each by themselves. It was when i swapped which slots they were in (stick one in slot three and stick two in slot one)that i got the problems. This morning, after having so much trouble i pulled them out and returned them to the original slots (stick one in slot one and stick two in slot three) and all seems to be fine, at least for the moment.
thoughts?
PS.. i am about to go to the windows memory tester thing-a-ma-bob and print out those directions and try running that. Also while that is printing i am going to download that prime95 as well.
#44
Posted 28 September 2009 - 07:08 AM
If it did, that would be a sign of faulty memory.any chance memtest overloaded the memory?
Back in my radio maintenance days, we used to call such mysteries "FM", though it was not for frequency modulation, but for a specific type of magic, the name of which is not suitable for family audiences. These "FM" event are often caused by... ...gremlins.Can you think of any way i could figure out why exactly these two sticks seem to hate each
I see that link is from the Patriot Memory forums - too bad it went unanswered. Is yours the same ASUS board? And you are not overclocking, right? Don't until this resolved.
And just to verify, this computer and this RAM worked fine for about 2 years, correct?
#45
Posted 28 September 2009 - 07:17 AM
fm magic.. lol fm (imo) stands for f*** me.. and yes that is not suitable for family audiences... gremlins indeed, i think my computer has had some take up residence over the weekend.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users