intel core I3 vs AMD QUAD CORE
Started by
kenbarber
, Aug 05 2011 11:14 AM
#1
Posted 05 August 2011 - 11:14 AM
#2
Posted 05 August 2011 - 11:48 AM
No. It is still a dual core vs quad. And like all rules, there are exceptions, but it is still safe to say a quad is better than dual.all other things being equal is a duel core Intel I3 hyperthreading to 4 threads equal to a AMD athlon II quad core?
And it is an impractical question anyway because you will not find a dual core Intel based motherboard that will have "all other things equal" to a quad based AMD motherboard.
#3
Posted 05 August 2011 - 11:56 AM
thank you for validaying my thoughts as opposed to someone trying to tell me his product was equal. i kept on thinking it is a duel core. hperthreading just confused the issue.
#4
Posted 05 August 2011 - 12:06 PM
HT is a method to "virtually" create two processors out of one. It does improve performance, but it is not equal to physically having twice the number of cores.
I am sure there are some entry level quads that would struggle to keep up with a high-end dual core HT processor. But with all else being equal, they are not!
I am sure there are some entry level quads that would struggle to keep up with a high-end dual core HT processor. But with all else being equal, they are not!
#5
Posted 05 August 2011 - 12:22 PM
thanks
#6
Posted 07 August 2011 - 08:22 AM
If that Intel i3 is a Sandy Bridge, it will outperform the quad-core AMD Athlon in most situations except the select few programs that fully take advantage of more than two cores. Sandy Bridge is a superior microarchitecture, so while the numbers might look equal, that's only part of the story.
#7
Posted 07 August 2011 - 09:50 PM
nothing was said of Sandy Bridge. it is a mid range gateway computer.
#8
Posted 08 August 2011 - 12:17 AM
Was the processor an Intel Core i3-2100?
#9
Posted 08 August 2011 - 10:22 PM
i think so.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users