Processor Question
Started by
Cloud Striffe
, Jul 18 2005 11:20 AM
#1
Posted 18 July 2005 - 11:20 AM
#2
Posted 18 July 2005 - 01:53 PM
Well considering that you cant replace the cpu and most people arent likely to be buying a replacement laptop of that standard for a while then the bigger cpu is probably a good idea, its the disadvantage of a laptop im afraid.
#3
Posted 18 July 2005 - 02:45 PM
But what would be the difference in performance?
#4
Posted 18 July 2005 - 03:08 PM
It would be minimal. I can't really say wether or not it's worth it, I think it all depends on how much your budget.
Personnally, I wouldn't pay $300 for that performance boost. But I'm also on a pretty limited budget at the moment.
Personnally, I wouldn't pay $300 for that performance boost. But I'm also on a pretty limited budget at the moment.
#5
Posted 18 July 2005 - 03:12 PM
It really isn't that my budget is "limited" but I really don't see the neccesity of upgrading if the upgrade is only minimal in its effectiveness. So I think I am going to go with the XPS with 2.0 but if anyone can prove to me that it would be worth spending the money then i might. But it has to be a logical reason not just because it is a higher number.
#6
Posted 18 July 2005 - 05:47 PM
Find some reviews on laptop cpus if you can find newer ones on a big site they will more than likely have benchmarked both, so you will be able to see for yourself, GOOGLE time.
#7
Posted 19 July 2005 - 12:05 PM
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users