Well we technically can fight nature alot of the time, however its not a good idea to do this nature is all about equilibrium you dont want to upset that equilibrium more than you really have to as in such a complex system it is hard to judge the consequences. But hurricanes and earthquakes having absolutely nothing to do with humans, they would happen if we werent here, the reason for all the hurricanes this year is every so many years there are really big hurricanes its part of the weather pattern for the areas afected. And earthquakes are something we cant affect at all they happen when they happen, we can certainly predict them sometimes given enough warning and of course the inclinattion to want to predict them but it would be a little presumptious to think that we were the cause of seismic shifting.
Back to the point, population control is a possible alternative in many countries but even at that we need a fair negative population growth in many countries and that isnt a good thing for them. It is a fair possibilty that once the problems get worse we will fall back on the onld population control methods war famine and disease, and those are the natural ways to control populations, it sounds cruel but from a logical stand point thew world shouldnt be throwing aid into places like africa, because if we stopped and we will have to stop without some kind of major development to stop overpopulation, the problems of famine will be so much worse because that continent as a whole as far more people than it can sustain at the moment.
Edited by warriorscot, 05 November 2005 - 07:33 AM.