(I like Intel myself)
Intel or AMD
Started by
Peptobismol165
, May 22 2010 01:12 PM
#1
Posted 22 May 2010 - 01:12 PM
(I like Intel myself)
#2
Posted 23 May 2010 - 01:06 PM
I personally much prefer Intel, though not based on any good, real evidence.
#3
Posted 23 May 2010 - 09:24 PM
Intel if you want the best performance.
AMD if you want the best bang for the buck.
AMD if you want the best bang for the buck.
#4
Posted 24 May 2010 - 07:45 PM
Depends purely on whichever gives the best performance for the budget. Currently at home I have an Intel, the E6750 - when I purchased it (almost three years ago now) it was well and truly noted for a great "bang for buck" processor.
It still runs Windows 7 very quick for my needs so I won't be upgrading any time soon. When I do, I'll be comparing the market once again.
It still runs Windows 7 very quick for my needs so I won't be upgrading any time soon. When I do, I'll be comparing the market once again.
#5
Posted 25 May 2010 - 03:45 AM
Tom's Hardware > CPU Heirarchy Chart : Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: March 2010
http://www.tomshardw...cpu,2570-7.html
http://www.tomshardw...cpu,2570-7.html
#6
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:13 PM
AMD rules the lower priced market but intel by far has the performance win - they've had it for about 5 years, now (since they released the conroe core).
#7
Posted 29 May 2010 - 12:37 PM
AMD. No scientific evidence to back me up, but it's a Fords and Chevys discussion.
Johanna
Johanna
#8
Posted 29 May 2010 - 10:00 PM
AMD. No scientific evidence to back me up, but it's a Fords and Chevys discussion.
Johanna
Okay then Johanna, I'm gonna get me an AMD processor next time.
#9
Posted 31 May 2010 - 07:41 AM
It is mostly a Honda Vs Toyota discussion.
I like AMD's they have been known to run cooler.
However Intel processers have been known to be on the top of the performance charts.
I like AMD's they have been known to run cooler.
However Intel processers have been known to be on the top of the performance charts.
#10
Posted 03 June 2010 - 08:35 PM
it's a Fords and Chevys discussion.
Wow, Johanna (and tuxmaster)!!
Those are the exact same analogy I use when people ask me that! Ford/Chevy, Toyota/Honda.
Great minds...
Elster
Edited by Elster, 03 June 2010 - 08:37 PM.
#11
Posted 03 June 2010 - 10:14 PM
But it's not that great an analogy.
Both Toyota and Honda are great. Ford is great, but Chevy is pretty much so-so...
Both Toyota and Honda are great. Ford is great, but Chevy is pretty much so-so...
#12
Posted 16 July 2010 - 09:31 AM
Intel typiclly delivers better when it comes to performance, and is certainly reliable, but can be more expensive. AMD is more easily overclocked and is less expensive but delivers comparable performance in comparisonto Intel. But again, as stated in the previous posts generally Intel does deliever better performance. It is a matter of personal prefernce and what needs you are trying to meet.
Hope that helps!
Hope that helps!
#13
Posted 16 July 2010 - 11:57 PM
INTEL for sure.
#14
Posted 17 July 2010 - 09:05 PM
I go with whatever gives me the best bang for the buck for the system I am building for myself or for a customer. Same goes in regards to graphics cards when considering ATI or nVidia. My desktop system is an AMD platform with an ATI graphics card, but my laptop is an Intel platform with nVidia graphics card.
If I had no budget constraint, I would go with an Intel system at the moment.
If I had no budget constraint, I would go with an Intel system at the moment.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users