If this is true, do you think this presents an advance in the war against malware or is it just a temporary fight against it till malware coders find their way around the new defenses?

Windows XP Less Secure Than Windows 7?
#1
Posted 03 December 2010 - 03:05 PM

If this is true, do you think this presents an advance in the war against malware or is it just a temporary fight against it till malware coders find their way around the new defenses?
#2
Posted 04 December 2010 - 12:35 AM

To answer your question, however, I do think it's an advance. The malware writers seem to make advancements also, but as long as they have fewer exploits available, they have fewer choices to wreak havoc.
#3
Posted 06 December 2010 - 11:50 PM

#4
Posted 14 December 2010 - 02:57 PM

Windows 7 (and Vista) do a lot to enhance security. Microsoft fundamentally changed they way they code, and security touches every part of their process. Specific code changes to the OS that block exploits completely are address space randomization and data execution prevention. While user account control was much maligned in the now infamous Apple commercials, its file and registry virtualization prevent malware from installing when enabled. Maybe you've read recently about the USB drive malware that installs simply by plugging it in? Windows 7 is not affected.
64-bit versions of Windows 7 go even further by adding hardware based (CPU) data execution protection, and kernel patch protection. Also signed native 64-bit drivers are required. This makes the system not only more secure, but also more stable.
I've never understood why some people seemingly have no problem spending a hundred dollars or more on security software and subscriptions, not to mention the risk of data loss, so they can run an outdated or even pirated OS. But they won't pay to upgrade to a more secure operating system.
Windows 7 Home Premium is appropriate for most home users. An upgrade is $109.99 at Amazon or NewEgg. It comes with both 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Install 64-bit if your hardware supports it. Allow automatic updates and keep your system patched. Keep your applications updated (Adobe Flash and Reader, Office, Java). Setup standard user accounts, and use them. Install Microsoft Security Essentials (free). For $110 you'll have a much more secure system then if you were to buy the best antivirus, antimalware, firewall, etc. available for Windows XP.
#5
Posted 14 December 2010 - 08:35 PM

I have never thought or known of specified targeting from malware coders. I feel pretty safe currently, but I'd feel even safer to get out of that population.
Good point! If Windows 7 and Vista are the strongholds (at least compared to XP and others) I'm learning them to be, then that sounds like a fair price compared to the less risky and possibly more pricey option.I've never understood why some people seemingly have no problem spending a hundred dollars or more on security software and subscriptions, not to mention the risk of data loss, so they can run an outdated or even pirated OS. But they won't pay to upgrade to a more secure operating system.
This is good information to know for any Windows XP, lower, or future Windows user. Thanks for all the in-depth info and opinions, Admin. Again, very helpful.
Edited by Danc20, 14 December 2010 - 08:40 PM.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
As Featured On:






