I think something went wrong during the test.
http://reviews.cnet....mp;kbps=58285.7
Edited by keithr128, 23 June 2007 - 11:38 PM.
Need help with your computer or device? Want to learn new tech skills? You're in the right place!
Geeks to Go is a friendly community of tech experts who can solve any problem you have. Just create a free account and post your question. Our volunteers will reply quickly and guide you through the steps. Don't let tech troubles stop you. Join Geeks to Go now and get the support you need!
Edited by keithr128, 23 June 2007 - 11:38 PM.
Yeah it's an awesome paragraph, I've seen it many times. I don't know how common this joke is, but I'll tell it anyway (family-friendly!):
A man walks into a pub and finds a table near the bar. He grabs a beer and sits down by himself, waiting for his mates. After a minute, he hears this voice say "That shirt looks really good on you". He looks around, a bit confused, but he can only see some other people at a table a short ways from him, it couldn't be them. The man takes a sip from his beer. Not long after, he hears another voice say "I like what you've done with your hair". He is so confused that he stands up and looks around. The bartender looks at him but they don't speak. The man sits back down and takes another sip of his beer. Now another voice speaks up: "You really do have a handsome face." The man jumps up and spins around again, but can't see anything. The bartender comes over and asks, "Are you alright, mate?" The man answers "Yeah, you won't believe it, but I keep hearing these voices saying nice things to me." The bartender smiles and says "Oh, that must be the peanuts. They are complimentary tonight."
HAHA he has too!Actually post 1435 was admin changing the rules to say no back to back posts, (he also temporarily closed the thread).
In post 1436 he re-opened the thread. (resulting in the first back to back post after the rules change).
The only way he could have avoided this after he closed the thread at post 1435 would have been to make the "no back to back posts" rule in 1436. (probably would have required a pair of edits).
I see frantique is reading this now. Hi UBER Chic!!!
Edited by Titan8990, 24 June 2007 - 07:08 PM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board
Licensed to: Geeks to Go, Inc.