Jump to content

Welcome to Geeks to Go - Register now for FREE

Need help with your computer or device? Want to learn new tech skills? You're in the right place!
Geeks to Go is a friendly community of tech experts who can solve any problem you have. Just create a free account and post your question. Our volunteers will reply quickly and guide you through the steps. Don't let tech troubles stop you. Join Geeks to Go now and get the support you need!

How it Works Create Account
Photo

Commit charge - very different on two PCs


  • Please log in to reply

#1
caughtintheact

caughtintheact

    New Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
Hi,

I have two networked PCs at home both with WinXP Pro SP. Computer 1 (see below) has 1.5GB RAM and Computer 2 has 1GB RAM. Both are using Pentium 4 processors, Computer 1 has a Prescott (hyperthreading) processor rated at 3.2Ghz, and Computer 2 has a 2.4Ghz processor. The program configuration on each is roughly the same in terms of installed programs. However, today, when I booted up both PCs, the commit charge on one was much different than the other.
Computer 1 Normal Memory Usage
Computer 2 Excessive Memory usage
For example, a program that uses say 15MB RAM on computer 1 is using 35MB RAM on computer 2.
My total commit charge on Computer 1 is about 400MB with 41 processes, but on Computer 2, the commit charge is about 1.36GB with 43 processes.

This just started happening today, but the only thing I have done out of the ordinary is that yesterday I set up file sharing on the network. I tried resetting the page file on Computer 2 to system managed, but that did not change anything after rebooting.

Here are some more examples:
Computer 1: Explorer.exe 59MB
Computer 2: explorer.exe 102MB

Computer 1: weatherclock.exe 14MB
Computer 2: weatherclock.exe 28MB

Computer 1: psi.exe 53MB
Computer 2: psi.exe 74MB

Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this and whether there is a fix?
  • 0

Advertisements


#2
The Skeptic

The Skeptic

    Trusted Tech

  • Technician
  • 4,075 posts
When you encounter a problem that is clearly related in time to a given change, the first thing is to undo the change and see if things go back to what they were before.
  • 0

#3
caughtintheact

caughtintheact

    New Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
I am not sure it was related to any of the changes, since it only affected the computer on which I did not first enable file sharing. The strange thing is that even though it appears to be using almost three times as much memory, the computer is not running slow or otherwise misbehaving. Scans for spyware and viruses, rootkits, etc, turn up nothing, and there are no unusual processes running.
  • 0

#4
The Skeptic

The Skeptic

    Trusted Tech

  • Technician
  • 4,075 posts
I have no good answer for that. My approach is that if there are no visible problems, I do not look for answers. One of the main reasons is that you can't test your corrective actions because the computer will not show any improvement.

Maybe other people will know better.


Regards.
  • 0

#5
caughtintheact

caughtintheact

    New Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
Skeptic,
Thanks. I know this is a weird one, and I understand what you are saying. These things don't happen for no reason, but if I changed anything to cause it as opposed tosomething going beserk in the system I sure cannot remember what it was.
  • 0

#6
caughtintheact

caughtintheact

    New Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
Problem solved. After removing some programs the commit charge reverted to normal. I believe that the cupolrit was a program called rocketdock, a program which I had been using for a year, but apparently started colliding with another program, which copuld have been Haute Secure or Avira AV (as I removed both of them also)
  • 0

#7
The Skeptic

The Skeptic

    Trusted Tech

  • Technician
  • 4,075 posts
Well done. Thanks for letting us know.
  • 0






Similar Topics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

As Featured On:

Microsoft Yahoo BBC MSN PC Magazine Washington Post HP