Choosing the best parts on a low budget
#1
Posted 12 July 2011 - 01:07 AM
#2
Posted 12 July 2011 - 07:24 AM
When looking at the entire line of processors from each maker, Intels do perform better, run cooler, and consume less power - but tend to cost more.AMD seems cheaper but I am not sure if it can perform as well as Intel processors.
But when you don't have a preference, you can't look at the whole line, you have to compare specific CPUs. I prefer Intels, but make no mistake, AMDs make great CPUs too.
Watching movies is no problem - it takes virtually no computer horsepower to watch a DVD, BluRay or whatever. And today's latest integrated graphics solutions, especially when coupled with a graphics oriented CPU like the i3, i5, or i7 can even support good, not the best, but good gaming - when coupled with lots of RAM. It is important to remember that game makers know that most people don't have the budgets for monster game machines costing $2000+. So these games are designed to provide good "game play" on lessor machines by cutting back on the background details and "extra" graphics features that do nothing for the "play" of the game except add visual effects.
The case and power supplies are two critical components often over looked, or where corners are cut - in a bad way. The case MUST protect the interior components from bumps and kicks. But more importantly, a case MUST provide adequate front to back air flow through the case. So the case is your first purchase. I look for large (120mm or larger) case fan support, preferably at least 1 in front and 1 in back. And I will never buy a case without a washable, removable air filter. I like Antec cases.
The PSU is super critical, and should be your last purchase. Why last? Because until you chose the rest of the components, you will not know your power requirements. Do NOT go cheap on your PSU!!!!
And note I always recommend all computers be on a "good" UPS with AVR.
Staying inside $600 is going to be tough. What do you bring to the table? Do you need a monitor, keyboard, mouse and speakers too? And don't forget the OS.
#3
Posted 12 July 2011 - 05:54 PM
I'm going to buy the monitors, speakers, etc. and I have a Windows 7 CD already. I was trying to allocate the funds so that I don't go over $1000 in buying everything.
#4
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:46 PM
I ask myself that for every new build. First, it has to the support the CPU I settled on. Then I look for the latest version of the integrated devices. For example, DDR3 RAM, USB3.0 and SATA 6Gbit/s. Except for some very budget, entry level boards, most boards have pretty good 7.1 (8-channel) sound - good enough for the vast majority of computer speakers. If I am buying a board with integrated graphics, which I do more and more of these days, it has to support the video outputs I need for my monitor, or monitors in my case. That would require at least two digital outputs. HDMI and Display Port will be the latest standards, with DVI and D-Sub (analog) in the process of fading away.I wonder though, what do people look for when buying a motherboard?
I don't get boards with chipset fans. They are noisy. They wear out quickly. And they are not needed with a decent passive (heatsink only) system in a good case - a case providing good cooling.
I like Gigabyte boards. And if buying Intel CPU, Intel makes some good boards too. And ASUS is a top tier maker as well. But I have also used Foxconn, MSI, Biostar, Chaintech, and probably a couple others. They all buy pretty much the same components (chipset, graphics, audio, BIOS, etc.) from the various makers and the ATX Form Factor standards doesn't give them much room for customization.
eSATA is becoming popular for external drives that connect directly to the controller, rather than going through the USB. So that may be a feature to look for.
There are some excellent, and reasonably priced µATX boards that would probably meet your needs. And in a mid tower, you have lots of room to stick your hands in there and still see what you are doing.
What you need to do is start looking at prices of the various components you will need - CPU, RAM, board, case, PSU. With no graphics card, a good 500 - 600W PSU will be more than enough. Motherboards come in dual or triple channel memory architecture. This means they support using the RAM modules in pairs or trips to optimize memory performance. I recommend 6Gb (3 x 2Gb) for triple channel boards and 8Gb (2 x 4Gb or 4 x 2Gb) for dual channel. For best performance, the RAM modules need have matched electrical specification. To ensure that, it is recommended they be the same brand and model number - and RAM makers package their RAM in dual and trip packages to same them a few cents, err, I mean for your convenience.
And then you will need 64-bit Windows to take advantage of that extra RAM.
Some places have "bundles" where they have already matched a motherboard and CPU, usually at a small discount. Newegg and others have kits - though I note you often get other things you don't need - like an anti-malware program that costs money.
#5
Posted 13 July 2011 - 12:53 AM
but I would like for the computer to run games smoothly while multitasking.
What is your interpretation of multitasking? Having email, browser, office application etc running in the background? or Photoshop, Maya, Video encoding running and a game?
For your $600 budget you are looking at buying these parts only?
Motherboard.
CPU.
RAM.
HDD.
DVD or Blue ray.
Case.
PSU.
Edited by iammykyl, 13 July 2011 - 12:56 AM.
#6
Posted 13 July 2011 - 06:00 AM
#7
Posted 14 July 2011 - 11:57 PM
> http://www.xbitlabs....0_23.html#sect0
> http://www.legitrevi...article/1652/8/
You can do more research and see if this build is what would be OK for you.
Mobo. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813157260
CPU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103942
RAM. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820104173
HDD. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822136319
DVD. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16827106289
CASE. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16811129066
PSU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817371047
Optional.
GPU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814121441
#8
Posted 15 July 2011 - 12:00 AM
> http://www.xbitlabs....0_23.html#sect0
> http://www.legitrevi...article/1652/8/
You can do more research and see if this build is what would be OK for you.
Mobo. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813157260
CPU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103942
RAM. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820104173
HDD. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822136319
DVD. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16827106289
CASE. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16811129066
PSU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817371047
Optional.
GPU. > http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814121441
#9
Posted 15 July 2011 - 01:32 AM
@iammykyl I would like to be able to open a lot of windows and not lag, like those examples you mentioned. And for $600 I am looking for only the necessary components and not extra upgrade parts. Thanks for the links by the way.
My wishlist:
Case: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16811119233
Motherboard: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813130571
Graphics Card: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814130640
Power Supply: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817139019
CPU: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819115074
RAM: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820231416
HDD: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822148697
Disk Drive: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16827151222
#10
Posted 15 July 2011 - 06:11 AM
Your CPU link goes to a i5 SB 2400.
HDD. Consider changing to the Samsung F3,
> http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822152185
Info. > http://www.bit-tech....3-1tb-review/10
> http://techreport.co...cles.x/19330/11
Your selected CPU if installed on the P67 Mobo will deny you access to integrated graphics as there are no on board video outlet and being a non K CPU does not have access to overclocking. (P67 Mobo + K2500 or K2600 CPU)
Usually a non K CPU is installed on a H67 Mob, still no overclocking but access to integrated graphics as there is usually video outlets installed.
Consider using a Z68 Mobo for the latest tech and access to every feature of any particular CPU that is installed..
Info. > http://www.bit-tech....l-z68-chipset/1
> http://www.newegg.co...2^13-157-252-TS
#11
Posted 15 July 2011 - 06:21 AM
I am not in favor of overclocking and don't see limitations on overclocking as a problem. Overclocking is, frankly, overrated - especially in today's graphics oriented world. And, overclocking validates the terms of both AMD and Intel warranties!
#12
Posted 15 July 2011 - 05:31 PM
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users