PS2 and XBOX
Started by
RockyIV
, Aug 10 2005 04:38 AM
#31
Posted 15 August 2005 - 04:58 AM
#32
Posted 15 August 2005 - 05:05 AM
No it proved they have higher clock speeds.
I have a 2 ghz cpu but it is faster than a 3ghz pentium 4. Clockspeed is a poor indicator of performance so say me and all the textbooks i have ever read on computer hardware.
I have a 2 ghz cpu but it is faster than a 3ghz pentium 4. Clockspeed is a poor indicator of performance so say me and all the textbooks i have ever read on computer hardware.
#33
Posted 15 August 2005 - 05:35 AM
PS2 all the way!! I dont think that XBOX is bad, but as a gamer and also as a selective gamer....for me PS2 kicks ***!!!!
Boo-Yeah
Boo-Yeah
#34
Posted 15 August 2005 - 06:27 AM
ps2 had to many jaggies on games XBOX cut that out with (AA) anti-aliasing which was excellent plus if ps2 made doom 3 for it now that wud be choppy gameplay its sik on the xbox cuz they can do more stuff with xbox than ps2 like add more detail to the game which if they did for ps2 it wouldnt be very good
#35
Posted 15 August 2005 - 07:06 AM
Hey does anyone know the real FSB clock
for the PS3 And the XBox 360 and if so,
what is it times by?
Or if you can give a full spec that would be
good, thanks all
for the PS3 And the XBox 360 and if so,
what is it times by?
Or if you can give a full spec that would be
good, thanks all
#36
Posted 15 August 2005 - 07:48 AM
They havent released a full spec, the cell processors are a revolutionary i dont think they have a fsb. The 360 is just a power pc chip with 3 cores it should have a fsb similar to a g5 or anyother cpu in that range of cpus. Also the xbox was a much newer console it would be dissapointing if it didnt have some better features. Doom3 im sure would look fine on the ps2 if they ever fully optimised it but in the history of the ps2 there have only been a handful of fully optimised games for it as it has a very unique architecture. The xbox is essentialy a old pc it uses a pentium 3 processor straight off the shelf. It can do what it does because the os and games are heavily optimised for that exact configuration if everyone had identical high end pcs games would look unbeliavable you can allready see the effects of a level of optimisation on doom3 which was optimised for nvidia cards and hl2 runs better on ati cards.
#37
Posted 16 August 2005 - 12:23 AM
I reckon Ps2 is better cause better games but in graphics xbox beats ps2
#38
Posted 16 August 2005 - 12:25 AM
True but the PS3 has better graphics than XBOX 360.....I think!
Regards RockyIV
Regards RockyIV
#39
Posted 16 August 2005 - 04:17 AM
Nah the xbox has better gfx the ps3 has more processing power, all in all it evens out.
#40
Posted 17 August 2005 - 02:47 AM
About PS3 and XBOX 360 which has better gameplay?
Regards RockyIV
Regards RockyIV
#41
Posted 17 August 2005 - 02:58 AM
The Xbox 360 has released more games so far and ps3 hasnt but i would say XBOX 360 has better gameplay it also features a MEDIA CENTRE which is cool
#42
Posted 17 August 2005 - 04:59 AM
It has more games so it must have better gameplay, aye thats some great logic there in action. You cant comment on gameplay until you play both over a few games.
#43
Posted 18 August 2005 - 05:48 AM
Is it true that Halo 3 is out on XBOX 360?
#44
Posted 18 August 2005 - 07:28 AM
Look, the Xbox is better by far, i had the option of getting a PS2 or XBox, i chose xbox.
The PS2 is like 6yrs old!
It breaks really easy too.
The XBox 2 and PS3 will be coming out quite soon after one another, PS3 might be better than XBox 360 but we'll have to wait and see.
The PS2 is like 6yrs old!
It breaks really easy too.
The XBox 2 and PS3 will be coming out quite soon after one another, PS3 might be better than XBox 360 but we'll have to wait and see.
#45
Posted 18 August 2005 - 07:46 AM
Well...I am going to go with my Sega Dreamcast that I still play and still buying games for .
I have owned three PS 2's, and I still own two...the first one is with my neice, the second is in my bedroom, and the third is in my living room and was bought because it was more quiet and had a built in IR receiver.
XBOX games are pretty cool, but the controller is too bulky for me...I handle the bulky Dreacst controller much better.
Famos
I have owned three PS 2's, and I still own two...the first one is with my neice, the second is in my bedroom, and the third is in my living room and was bought because it was more quiet and had a built in IR receiver.
XBOX games are pretty cool, but the controller is too bulky for me...I handle the bulky Dreacst controller much better.
Famos
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users