Is it just me but..
Started by
Ammalgam
, Jun 23 2006 01:10 PM
#1
Posted 23 June 2006 - 01:10 PM
#2
Posted 23 June 2006 - 01:27 PM
the TRUE value will come from FULLY vista compliant hardwear that can take full advantage of the nifty stuff that goes on in the background..as well as the whole aero thing...remember...it's still in beta so it's not technically finished
#3
Posted 23 June 2006 - 02:01 PM
True but do I really need Aero to be able to surf the web better, or write emails, or use Office? I understand the need to be pretty but at the end of the day, XP or 2003 are pretty nifty when you use comparable hardware.
#4
Posted 23 June 2006 - 09:50 PM
After all the months and different builds that I've spent with Vista, I must say that I am extremely dissapointed in it and I will not buy Vista. I highly prefer XP. I'm holding out for Vienna
Vienna is supposed to address many of the issues that Vista was originally supposed to solve! LMAO! I haven't seen any boot times with Vista that are "as fast as turning on a TV". LMAO! That's actually what they originally claimed it would be! What a frickin' joke! Vista takes about three times as long to boot as my copy of XP.
Vienna is supposed to address many of the issues that Vista was originally supposed to solve! LMAO! I haven't seen any boot times with Vista that are "as fast as turning on a TV". LMAO! That's actually what they originally claimed it would be! What a frickin' joke! Vista takes about three times as long to boot as my copy of XP.
#5
Posted 23 June 2006 - 10:03 PM
Yeah I agree.
It's still beta and all but man, it takes twice as long to boot as Win 2003.
It's still beta and all but man, it takes twice as long to boot as Win 2003.
#6
Posted 23 June 2006 - 10:13 PM
Is there anything we don't agree on? lol
#7
Posted 23 June 2006 - 10:24 PM
Scary huh?
Maybe you're my secret Windows Twin?
Maybe you're my secret Windows Twin?
#8
Posted 24 June 2006 - 04:33 AM
Alot of that is because its still in beta, its not even a release candidate, the fast boot times are usually down to optimisations and they wont do that and add the stuff needed to do that until closer to release its still 6 months to release date. Also try using a flashpen should dpeed it up.
#9
Posted 24 June 2006 - 08:54 AM
There is a lot more going on behind the interface that makes it worth something. There are a lot of added security measures that will protect your system more than XP does. The slow boot times are probably from incompatible drivers and programs, which should be expected in a beta operating system.
#10
Posted 24 June 2006 - 09:10 AM
I think the "security feautures" are just major annoyances. If I want security, I'll run Linux.
#11
Posted 24 June 2006 - 01:08 PM
Lol, you dont see most of the security features if you mean UAC thats one feature thats not finished yet, there are ALOT of others most of them you cant see.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users