Tell me what you know!
Started by
top213
, Jan 26 2010 02:56 PM
#1
Posted 26 January 2010 - 02:56 PM
#2
Posted 27 January 2010 - 12:23 AM
Hello top213,
Sorry to say I can barely make out what is going on.. but here's some input, either way.
Looks to me like the date/time is being expressed in multiple ways. Unless it was a typo.. your first time results is showing the date along with HOUR and (minutes or seconds?). The second time shows all three, HOUR, MINUTES, and SECONDS. Lastly, the signout time is shown with a different form of date mm/dd/yyyy and I believe the time is shown as HOUR and MINUTES. It's hard to tell with this example, as 46 and 48 are used.. but I believe the last one is just not showing seconds. Therefore, no matter how many seconds of minute 48 have gone by, it will still show 48.
Wow, did that make any sense to you? I would suggest changing the way date/time is being portrayed, but unsure if you CAN or if these are just things you are handed.. (Lol) Could you give some snapshots? Hmm. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Best regards,
-Jason
Sorry to say I can barely make out what is going on.. but here's some input, either way.
Looks to me like the date/time is being expressed in multiple ways. Unless it was a typo.. your first time results is showing the date along with HOUR and (minutes or seconds?). The second time shows all three, HOUR, MINUTES, and SECONDS. Lastly, the signout time is shown with a different form of date mm/dd/yyyy and I believe the time is shown as HOUR and MINUTES. It's hard to tell with this example, as 46 and 48 are used.. but I believe the last one is just not showing seconds. Therefore, no matter how many seconds of minute 48 have gone by, it will still show 48.
Wow, did that make any sense to you? I would suggest changing the way date/time is being portrayed, but unsure if you CAN or if these are just things you are handed.. (Lol) Could you give some snapshots? Hmm. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Best regards,
-Jason
#3
Posted 27 January 2010 - 07:48 AM
thanks for the input. To make things clearer. The document time date stamp expresses that the text entry was written past the time the document signature was made. Doesn't the ES signify the close the document? The other question was how can you place the same text into two different documents to wit a consult report and a progress note and place them into a running system to wit to different documents contain the same time date and es signature without stopping time.
#4
Posted 27 January 2010 - 07:59 AM
A better way of displaying the problem
date of note Jun 13,2008@08:46,
entry date Jun 13,2008@08:48:46
ES sign out 06/13/2008@08:48
The text entry expresses that the text was written after the signature. What is the meaning of this
date of note Jun 13,2008@08:46,
entry date Jun 13,2008@08:48:46
ES sign out 06/13/2008@08:48
The text entry expresses that the text was written after the signature. What is the meaning of this
#5
Posted 27 January 2010 - 10:23 AM
Ok, just a little confused but hanging on..
So is this your job? Or are these records being given to you.. Is there a chance that something was being edited for the 46 seconds? Maybe they have really slow processing time?
Uhm, is there any way you could get another example, a different one not from 8:48:46? Maybe I'll see something in the comparison. Also.. what is ES standing for in this case? Once again, sorry I'm making no sense and being a retard.
-Jason
So is this your job? Or are these records being given to you.. Is there a chance that something was being edited for the 46 seconds? Maybe they have really slow processing time?
Uhm, is there any way you could get another example, a different one not from 8:48:46? Maybe I'll see something in the comparison. Also.. what is ES standing for in this case? Once again, sorry I'm making no sense and being a retard.
-Jason
#6
Posted 27 January 2010 - 02:28 PM
The records are mine, and I think that they have been tampered with. another example would be
Date of note Jun 23, 2008@09:17
Entry date Jun 23, 2008@09:17:46
ES 06/23/ 2008 09:18
ES is the E signature of the author it should also express the time the document was close.
This how the rest of my records are expressed. They are in the proper sequence. There is no extra seconds as expressed in the other documents.
Date of note Jun 23, 2008@09:17
Entry date Jun 23, 2008@09:17:46
ES 06/23/ 2008 09:18
ES is the E signature of the author it should also express the time the document was close.
This how the rest of my records are expressed. They are in the proper sequence. There is no extra seconds as expressed in the other documents.
#7
Posted 28 January 2010 - 10:52 AM
Hmm, I don't know what to tell you. If you think they're being tampered with, you should ask someone with higher authority at the VA about it. You don't want your medical bills or anything else messed up as well.
Let me know what you can find out, otherwise I really don't know what to tell you, sorry..
Let me know what you can find out, otherwise I really don't know what to tell you, sorry..
#8
Posted 28 January 2010 - 11:11 AM
I'm not sure if this will help clear things up but...
Whenever XP reads a file, it stamps the file with the date and time of the access.
Whenever XP reads a file, it stamps the file with the date and time of the access.
Similar Topics
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users